★★★★☆
4.7 étoiles sur 5 de 339 commentaires client
Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book - de (Broché - Mar 15, 2019) (Author)
Details Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book
Le tableau ci-dessous sont affichées des spécificités complètes concernant Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book
| Le Titre Du Fichier | Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book |
| Publié Le | |
| Traducteur | Savanha Haadiyah |
| Chiffre de Pages | 615 Pages |
| La taille du fichier | 71.45 MB |
| Langue du Livre | Anglais & Français |
| Éditeur | Information Age Publishing |
| ISBN-10 | 1316593664-VYP |
| Type de Données | PDF AMZ EPub HTML TR3 |
| Créateur | (Broché - Mar 15, 2019) |
| ISBN-13 | 273-0836855348-GRY |
| Nom de Fichier | Attributing-Development-Impact-The-Qualitative-Impact-Protocol-Case-Book.pdf |
Télécharger Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book Livre PDF Gratuit
Noté 005 Retrouvez Attributing Development Impact The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book et des millions de livres en stock sur Achetez neuf ou doccasion
Noté 005 Retrouvez Attributing Development Impact The Qualitative Impact Protocol Case Book et des millions de livres en stock sur Achetez neuf ou doccasion
Découvrez et achetez Mixed Methods Research in Poverty and Vulnerability Livraison en Europe à 1 centime seulement
In the scientific community and particularly in psychology and health there has been an active and ongoing debate on the relative merits of adopting either q…
With the objective of enabling colleges and universities to produce high quality research that will advance learning and national development it is our duty a…
We use cookies to offer you a better experience personalize content tailor advertising provide social media features and better understand the use of our services
Abstract Development evaluation refers to evaluating projects and programmes in development contexts Some evaluations are too narrow Narrow withindiscipline impact evaluations are weaker than multidisciplinary mixedmethods evaluations